Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) vs Bitaxe Hex
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) | Specification | Bitaxe Hex |
|---|---|---|
| 14.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 3.0 TH/s |
| 1,372 W | Consommation électrique | 90 W |
| 98.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 30.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 4.2 kg | Weight | 0.5 kg |
| 4,681 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 307 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 64/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th)
Bitaxe Hex
Based on BTC price of $62,822 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitaxe Hex edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 93% better power draw (1,372.0 vs 90.0 W). The Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) holds the edge in hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) and Bitaxe Hex diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) 367% more hashrate (14.0 vs 3.0 TH/s)
- Bitaxe Hex 93% better power draw (1,372.0 vs 90.0 W)
- Bitaxe Hex 69% better efficacité (98.0 vs 30.0 J/TH)
- Bitaxe Hex 88% better weight (4.2 vs 0.5 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) 1424% more heat output (4,681 vs 307 BTU/hr)
- Bitaxe Hex 106% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 64.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) | Metric | Bitaxe Hex |
|---|---|---|
| $65 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $399 |
| -$2.89 | Daily net profit | -$0.13 |
| -$1,122 | Net after 1 year | -$447 |
| -$2,178 | Net after 2 years | -$494 |
| -$3,235 | Net after 3 years | -$542 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitaxe HexScore: 64/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitaxe Hex30.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) or Bitaxe Hex more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Hex is more profitable at $-0.13/day compared to $-2.89/day for the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) or the Bitaxe Hex better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitaxe Hex is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) or the Bitaxe Hex?
The Bitaxe Hex scores 64/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) and Bitaxe Hex on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer S9 (14Th) runs at 98.0 J/TH while the Bitaxe Hex runs at 30.0 J/TH — a difference of 68.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 69% better efficacité (98.0 vs 30.0 J/TH).