Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Antminer Slim Edition (S17)

Antminer Slim Edition (S17)

Taux de hachage 50.0 TH/s Puissance 2,000 W Efficiency 40.0 J/TH
VS
iPollo B1L

iPollo B1L

Taux de hachage 58.0 TH/s Puissance 3,000 W Efficiency 51.7 J/TH

Antminer Slim Edition (S17) vs iPollo B1L

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer Slim Edition (S17) Specification iPollo B1L
50.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 58.0 TH/s
2,000 W Consommation électrique 3,000 W
40.0 J/TH Efficiency 51.7 J/TH
70 dB Niveau de bruit
7.5 kg Weight 12.7 kg
6,824 BTU/hr BTU Output 10,236 BTU/hr
42/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
D-Central Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer Slim Edition (S17)

Daily Revenue 0.00002262 BTC $1.45
Daily Electricity -$4.80
Daily Profit -$3.35
Monthly -$100.57
Yearly -$1,223.59

iPollo B1L

Daily Revenue 0.00002624 BTC $1.68
Daily Electricity -$7.20
Daily Profit -$5.52
Monthly -$165.62
Yearly -$2,015.04

Based on BTC price of $64,000 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Antminer Slim Edition (S17) l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 33% better power draw (2,000 vs 3,000 W). The iPollo B1L claws back ground on hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Antminer Slim Edition (S17) — l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) and iPollo B1L sit on each measurable spec:

  • iPollo B1L 16% more hashrate (50.0 vs 58.0 TH/s)
  • Antminer Slim Edition (S17) 33% better power draw (2,000 vs 3,000 W)
  • Antminer Slim Edition (S17) 23% better efficacité (40.0 vs 51.7 J/TH)
  • Antminer Slim Edition (S17) 41% better weight (7.5 vs 12.7 kg)
  • iPollo B1L 50% more heat output (6,824 vs 10,236 BTU/hr)
  • Antminer Slim Edition (S17) 91% more score de minage domestique (42.0 vs 22.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Antminer Slim Edition (S17) Metric iPollo B1L
$600 Upfront cost (MSRP) $430
-$3.35 Daily net profit -$5.52
-$1,824 Net after 1 year -$2,445
-$3,047 Net after 2 years -$4,460
-$4,271 Net after 3 years -$6,475
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer Slim Edition (S17)

Score: 42/100. 70 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer Slim Edition (S17)

40.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) or iPollo B1L more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) is more profitable at $-3.35/day compared to $-5.52/day for the iPollo B1L. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) or the iPollo B1L better for noise-sensitive spaces?

The Antminer Slim Edition (S17) is quieter at 70 dB compared to the iPollo B1L at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Antminer Slim Edition (S17) or iPollo B1L?

The Antminer Slim Edition (S17) scores 42/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iPollo B1L). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Antminer Slim Edition (S17) and iPollo B1L?

The Antminer Slim Edition (S17) runs at 40.0 J/TH while the iPollo B1L runs at 51.7 J/TH — a difference of 11.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 23% better efficacité (40.0 vs 51.7 J/TH).