Antminer T17 vs Bitaxe Hex
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer T17 | Specification | Bitaxe Hex |
|---|---|---|
| 40.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 3.0 TH/s |
| 2,200 W | Consommation électrique | 90 W |
| 55.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 30.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 9.5 kg | Weight | 0.5 kg |
| 7,506 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 307 BTU/hr |
| 84/100 | Home Mining Score | 64/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer T17
Bitaxe Hex
Based on BTC price of $64,000 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitaxe Hex l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 96% better power draw (2,200.0 vs 90.0 W). That said, the Antminer T17 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer T17 and Bitaxe Hex diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer T17 1233% more hashrate (40.0 vs 3.0 TH/s)
- Bitaxe Hex 96% better power draw (2,200.0 vs 90.0 W)
- Bitaxe Hex 45% better efficacité (55.0 vs 30.0 J/TH)
- Bitaxe Hex 40% better noise (75.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Bitaxe Hex 95% better weight (9.5 vs 0.5 kg)
- Antminer T17 2344% more heat output (7,506 vs 307 BTU/hr)
- Antminer T17 31% more score de minage domestique (84.0 vs 64.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Antminer T17 | Metric | Bitaxe Hex |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $399 |
| -$4.12 | Daily net profit | -$0.13 |
| -$1,504 | Net after 1 year | -$446 |
| -$3,009 | Net after 2 years | -$493 |
| -$4,513 | Net after 3 years | -$540 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer T17Score: 84/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitaxe Hex30.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Antminer T17 or Bitaxe Hex more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Hex is more profitable at $-0.13/day compared to $-4.12/day for the Antminer T17. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer T17 or the Bitaxe Hex better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitaxe Hex is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Antminer T17 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Antminer T17 vs Bitaxe Hex: which fits a residential setup better?
The Antminer T17 scores 84/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 64/100 for the Bitaxe Hex). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Antminer T17 and Bitaxe Hex on J/TH?
The Antminer T17 runs at 55.0 J/TH while the Bitaxe Hex runs at 30.0 J/TH — a difference of 25.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 45% better efficacité (55.0 vs 30.0 J/TH).