Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) vs NerdOctaxe Gamma
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) | Specification | NerdOctaxe Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| 10.5 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 8.0 TH/s |
| 1,432 W | Consommation électrique | 200 W |
| 136.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 25.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 4,200.0 kg | Weight | 0.8 kg |
| 4,886 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 682 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 61/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | D-Central |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th)
NerdOctaxe Gamma
Based on BTC price of $75,351 and current network difficulty as of May 27, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le NerdOctaxe Gamma l'emporte sur 5 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 86% better power draw (1,432 vs 200 W). The Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) holds the edge in hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) and NerdOctaxe Gamma sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) 31% more hashrate (10.5 vs 8.0 TH/s)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 86% better power draw (1,432 vs 200 W)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 82% better efficacité (136.4 vs 25.0 J/TH)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 100% better weight (4,200.0 vs 0.8 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) 616% more heat output (4,886 vs 682 BTU/hr)
- NerdOctaxe Gamma 97% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 61.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) | Metric | NerdOctaxe Gamma |
|---|---|---|
| $955 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $599 |
| -$3.07 | Daily net profit | -$0.20 |
| -$2,077 | Net after 1 year | -$673 |
| -$3,198 | Net after 2 years | -$747 |
| -$4,320 | Net after 3 years | -$821 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
NerdOctaxe GammaScore: 61/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
NerdOctaxe Gamma25.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) or NerdOctaxe Gamma more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the NerdOctaxe Gamma is more profitable at $-0.20/day compared to $-3.07/day for the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) or the NerdOctaxe Gamma better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The NerdOctaxe Gamma is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) or NerdOctaxe Gamma?
The NerdOctaxe Gamma scores 61/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) and NerdOctaxe Gamma on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer T9+ (10.5Th) runs at 136.4 J/TH while the NerdOctaxe Gamma runs at 25.0 J/TH — a difference of 111.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 82% better efficacité (136.4 vs 25.0 J/TH).