Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Bolon Miner B11

Bolon Miner B11

Taux de hachage 70.0 TH/s Puissance 3,300 W Efficiency 47.1 J/TH
VS
Nerdminer

Nerdminer

Taux de hachage 50.0 KH/s Puissance 1 W Efficiency 20,000,000.0 J/TH

Bolon Miner B11 vs Nerdminer

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bolon Miner B11 Specification Nerdminer
70.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 50.0 KH/s
3,300 W Consommation électrique 1 W
47.1 J/TH Efficiency 20,000,000.0 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
11.5 kg Weight 0.1 kg
11,260 BTU/hr BTU Output 3 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 35/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Bolon Miner Manufacturer D-Central

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bolon Miner B11

Daily Revenue 0.00003167 BTC $1.99
Daily Electricity -$7.92
Daily Profit -$5.93
Monthly -$177.92
Yearly -$2,164.64

Nerdminer

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.00
Daily Profit -$0.00
Monthly -$0.07
Yearly -$0.88

Based on BTC price of $62,822 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Bolon Miner B11 comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 4 (efficacité, hashrate). The standout gap is 139999999900% more hashrate (70.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Bolon Miner B11's favour. That said, the Nerdminer isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Bolon Miner B11 — l'emporte sur 2 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Bolon Miner B11 and Nerdminer actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Bolon Miner B11 139999999900% more hashrate (70.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Nerdminer 100% better power draw (3,300.0 vs 1.0 W)
  • Bolon Miner B11 100% better efficacité (47.1 vs 20,000,000.0 J/TH)
  • Nerdminer 100% better weight (11.5 vs 0.1 kg)
  • Bolon Miner B11 331065% more heat output (11,259.6 vs 3.4 BTU/hr)
  • Nerdminer 59% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 35.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Bolon Miner B11 Metric Nerdminer
Upfront cost (MSRP) $29
-$5.93 Daily net profit -$0.00
-$2,165 Net after 1 year -$30
-$4,329 Net after 2 years -$31
-$6,494 Net after 3 years -$32
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Nerdminer

Score: 35/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Bolon Miner B11

47.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Bolon Miner B11 or Nerdminer more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Nerdminer is more profitable at $0.00/day compared to $-5.93/day for the Bolon Miner B11. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Bolon Miner B11 or Nerdminer?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Bolon Miner B11 or the Nerdminer?

The Nerdminer scores 35/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bolon Miner B11). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Bolon Miner B11 and Nerdminer?

The Bolon Miner B11 runs at 47.1 J/TH while the Nerdminer runs at 20,000,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 19,999,952.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (47.1 vs 20,000,000.0 J/TH).