Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

GMO miner B2

GMO miner B2

Taux de hachage 24.0 TH/s Puissance 1,950 W Efficiency 81.3 J/TH
VS
Whatsminer M30S+

Whatsminer M30S+

Taux de hachage 100.0 TH/s Puissance 3,400 W Efficiency 34.0 J/TH

GMO miner B2 vs Whatsminer M30S+

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

GMO miner B2 Specification Whatsminer M30S+
24.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 100.0 TH/s
1,950 W Consommation électrique 3,400 W
81.3 J/TH Efficiency 34.0 J/TH
Niveau de bruit 75 dB
Weight 11.5 kg
6,653 BTU/hr BTU Output 11,601 BTU/hr
28/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
GMO miner Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

GMO miner B2

Daily Revenue 0.00001086 BTC $0.68
Daily Electricity -$4.68
Daily Profit -$4.00
Monthly -$119.94
Yearly -$1,459.23

Whatsminer M30S+

Daily Revenue 0.00004524 BTC $2.84
Daily Electricity -$8.16
Daily Profit -$5.32
Monthly -$159.54
Yearly -$1,941.03

Based on BTC price of $62,822 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Whatsminer M30S+, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 317% more hashrate (24.0 vs 100.0 TH/s). The GMO miner B2 holds the edge in consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Whatsminer M30S+ — l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the GMO miner B2 and Whatsminer M30S+ sit on each measurable spec:

  • Whatsminer M30S+ 317% more hashrate (24.0 vs 100.0 TH/s)
  • GMO miner B2 43% better power draw (1,950 vs 3,400 W)
  • Whatsminer M30S+ 58% better efficacité (81.3 vs 34.0 J/TH)
  • Whatsminer M30S+ 74% more heat output (6,653 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
  • Whatsminer M30S+ 29% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 36.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

GMO miner B2 Metric Whatsminer M30S+
Upfront cost (MSRP) $1,800
-$4.00 Daily net profit -$5.32
-$1,459 Net after 1 year -$3,741
-$2,918 Net after 2 years -$5,682
-$4,378 Net after 3 years -$7,623
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Whatsminer M30S+

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Whatsminer M30S+

34.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

GMO miner B2 vs Whatsminer M30S+: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the GMO miner B2 is more profitable at $-4.00/day compared to $-5.32/day for the Whatsminer M30S+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

GMO miner B2 vs Whatsminer M30S+: which runs at a lower noise level?

The Whatsminer M30S+ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the GMO miner B2 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the GMO miner B2 or the Whatsminer M30S+?

The Whatsminer M30S+ scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the GMO miner B2). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between GMO miner B2 and Whatsminer M30S+?

The GMO miner B2 runs at 81.3 J/TH while the Whatsminer M30S+ runs at 34.0 J/TH — a difference of 47.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 58% better efficacité (81.3 vs 34.0 J/TH).