Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Bitaxe Gamma

Bitaxe Gamma

Taux de hachage 1,200.0 GH/s Puissance 15 W Efficiency 12.5 J/TH
VS
Bitaxe Hex

Bitaxe Hex

Taux de hachage 3.0 TH/s Puissance 90 W Efficiency 30.0 J/TH

Bitaxe Gamma vs Bitaxe Hex

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitaxe Gamma Specification Bitaxe Hex
1,200.0 GH/s Taux de hachage 3.0 TH/s
15 W Consommation électrique 90 W
12.5 J/TH Efficiency 30.0 J/TH
38 dB Niveau de bruit 45 dB
0.3 kg Weight 0.5 kg
51 BTU/hr BTU Output 307 BTU/hr
70/100 Home Mining Score 64/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
D-Central Manufacturer D-Central

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitaxe Gamma

Daily Revenue 0.00000054 BTC $0.03
Daily Electricity -$0.04
Daily Profit -$0.00
Monthly -$0.04
Yearly -$0.46

Bitaxe Hex

Daily Revenue 0.00000136 BTC $0.09
Daily Electricity -$0.22
Daily Profit -$0.13
Monthly -$3.87
Yearly -$47.14

Based on BTC price of $64,000 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitaxe Gamma edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 83% better power draw (15.0 vs 90.0 W) in the Bitaxe Gamma's favour. The Bitaxe Hex holds the edge in hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Bitaxe Gamma — l'emporte sur 5 des 6 facteurs

Spec Deltas

The Bitaxe Gamma and Bitaxe Hex diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Bitaxe Hex 150% more hashrate (1.2 vs 3.0 TH/s)
  • Bitaxe Gamma 83% better power draw (15.0 vs 90.0 W)
  • Bitaxe Gamma 58% better efficacité (12.5 vs 30.0 J/TH)
  • Bitaxe Gamma 16% better noise (38.0 vs 45.0 dB)
  • Bitaxe Gamma 40% better weight (0.3 vs 0.5 kg)
  • Bitaxe Hex 500% more heat output (51.2 vs 307.1 BTU/hr)
  • Bitaxe Gamma 9% more score de minage domestique (70.0 vs 64.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Bitaxe Gamma Metric Bitaxe Hex
$99 Upfront cost (MSRP) $399
-$0.00 Daily net profit -$0.13
-$99 Net after 1 year -$446
-$100 Net after 2 years -$493
-$100 Net after 3 years -$540
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Bitaxe Gamma

Score: 70/100. 38 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Bitaxe Gamma

12.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Bitaxe Gamma or the Bitaxe Hex?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Gamma is more profitable at $0.00/day compared to $-0.13/day for the Bitaxe Hex. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Bitaxe Gamma vs Bitaxe Hex: which runs at a lower noise level?

The Bitaxe Gamma is quieter at 38 dB compared to the Bitaxe Hex at 45 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Bitaxe Gamma vs Bitaxe Hex: which fits a residential setup better?

The Bitaxe Gamma scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 64/100 for the Bitaxe Hex). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Bitaxe Gamma vs Bitaxe Hex: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Bitaxe Gamma runs at 12.5 J/TH while the Bitaxe Hex runs at 30.0 J/TH — a difference of 17.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 58% better efficacité (12.5 vs 30.0 J/TH).