Bitaxe Gamma vs StrongU Hornbill H8
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitaxe Gamma | Specification | StrongU Hornbill H8 |
|---|---|---|
| 1,200.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 74.0 TH/s |
| 15 W | Consommation électrique | 3,330 W |
| 12.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 45.0 J/TH |
| 38 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 0.3 kg | Weight | 11.5 kg |
| 51 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,362 BTU/hr |
| 70/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| D-Central | Manufacturer | StrongU |
Profitability Comparison
Bitaxe Gamma
StrongU Hornbill H8
Based on BTC price of $63,093 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitaxe Gamma comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better power draw (15.0 vs 3,330.0 W). The StrongU Hornbill H8 claws back ground on hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitaxe Gamma and StrongU Hornbill H8 sit on each measurable spec:
- StrongU Hornbill H8 6067% more hashrate (1.2 vs 74.0 TH/s)
- Bitaxe Gamma 100% better power draw (15.0 vs 3,330.0 W)
- Bitaxe Gamma 72% better efficacité (12.5 vs 45.0 J/TH)
- Bitaxe Gamma 97% better weight (0.3 vs 11.5 kg)
- StrongU Hornbill H8 22091% more heat output (51.2 vs 11,362.0 BTU/hr)
- Bitaxe Gamma 218% more score de minage domestique (70.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitaxe Gamma | Metric | StrongU Hornbill H8 |
|---|---|---|
| $99 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,200 |
| -$0.00 | Daily net profit | -$5.88 |
| -$100 | Net after 1 year | -$3,346 |
| -$100 | Net after 2 years | -$5,492 |
| -$101 | Net after 3 years | -$7,638 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitaxe GammaScore: 70/100. 38 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitaxe Gamma12.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitaxe Gamma or the StrongU Hornbill H8?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Gamma is more profitable at $0.00/day compared to $-5.88/day for the StrongU Hornbill H8. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitaxe Gamma vs StrongU Hornbill H8: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Bitaxe Gamma is quieter at 38 dB compared to the StrongU Hornbill H8 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitaxe Gamma vs StrongU Hornbill H8: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitaxe Gamma scores 70/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the StrongU Hornbill H8). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitaxe Gamma and StrongU Hornbill H8?
The Bitaxe Gamma runs at 12.5 J/TH while the StrongU Hornbill H8 runs at 45.0 J/TH — a difference of 32.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 72% better efficacité (12.5 vs 45.0 J/TH).