Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Bitaxe Hex

Bitaxe Hex

Taux de hachage 3.0 TH/s Puissance 90 W Efficiency 30.0 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon T3 50T

Innosilicon T3 50T

Taux de hachage 50.0 TH/s Puissance 3,100 W Efficiency 62.0 J/TH

Bitaxe Hex vs Innosilicon T3 50T

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitaxe Hex Specification Innosilicon T3 50T
3.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 50.0 TH/s
90 W Consommation électrique 3,100 W
30.0 J/TH Efficiency 62.0 J/TH
45 dB Niveau de bruit
0.5 kg Weight 10.0 kg
307 BTU/hr BTU Output 10,577 BTU/hr
64/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
D-Central Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitaxe Hex

Daily Revenue 0.00000136 BTC $0.09
Daily Electricity -$0.22
Daily Profit -$0.13
Monthly -$3.92
Yearly -$47.72

Innosilicon T3 50T

Daily Revenue 0.00002262 BTC $1.42
Daily Electricity -$7.44
Daily Profit -$6.02
Monthly -$180.57
Yearly -$2,196.92

Based on BTC price of $62,822 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Bitaxe Hex comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 97% better power draw (90.0 vs 3,100.0 W). That said, the Innosilicon T3 50T isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Bitaxe Hex — l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

The Bitaxe Hex and Innosilicon T3 50T diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Innosilicon T3 50T 1567% more hashrate (3.0 vs 50.0 TH/s)
  • Bitaxe Hex 97% better power draw (90.0 vs 3,100.0 W)
  • Bitaxe Hex 52% better efficacité (30.0 vs 62.0 J/TH)
  • Bitaxe Hex 95% better weight (0.5 vs 10.0 kg)
  • Innosilicon T3 50T 3344% more heat output (307 vs 10,577 BTU/hr)
  • Bitaxe Hex 191% more score de minage domestique (64.0 vs 22.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Bitaxe Hex Metric Innosilicon T3 50T
$399 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$0.13 Daily net profit -$6.02
-$447 Net after 1 year -$2,197
-$494 Net after 2 years -$4,394
-$542 Net after 3 years -$6,591
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Bitaxe Hex

Score: 64/100. 45 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Bitaxe Hex

30.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Bitaxe Hex or Innosilicon T3 50T more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitaxe Hex is more profitable at $-0.13/day compared to $-6.02/day for the Innosilicon T3 50T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Bitaxe Hex or Innosilicon T3 50T?

The Bitaxe Hex is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Innosilicon T3 50T at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Bitaxe Hex or Innosilicon T3 50T?

The Bitaxe Hex scores 64/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Innosilicon T3 50T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Bitaxe Hex and Innosilicon T3 50T on J/TH?

The Bitaxe Hex runs at 30.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T3 50T runs at 62.0 J/TH — a difference of 32.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 52% better efficacité (30.0 vs 62.0 J/TH).