iBeLink BM-S1 vs Goldshell SC-BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-S1 | Specification | Goldshell SC-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 6.8 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 900.0 GH/s |
| 2,350 W | Consommation électrique | 200 W |
| 345.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 222.2 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 9.0 kg | Weight | 2.0 kg |
| 8,018 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 682 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 33/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b-sia | Algorithme | Blake2b-sia |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-S1
Goldshell SC-BOX
Based on BTC price of $73,473 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Goldshell SC-BOX comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). The standout gap is 91% better power draw (2,350 vs 200 W) in the Goldshell SC-BOX's favour. The iBeLink BM-S1 holds the edge in hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iBeLink BM-S1 and Goldshell SC-BOX sit on each measurable spec:
- iBeLink BM-S1 656% more hashrate (6.8 vs 0.9 TH/s)
- Goldshell SC-BOX 91% better power draw (2,350 vs 200 W)
- Goldshell SC-BOX 36% better efficacité (346 vs 222 J/TH)
- Goldshell SC-BOX 78% better weight (9.0 vs 2.0 kg)
- iBeLink BM-S1 1075% more heat output (8,018 vs 682 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell SC-BOX 27% more score de minage domestique (26.0 vs 33.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iBeLink BM-S1 | Metric | Goldshell SC-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $768 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $299 |
| -$5.41 | Daily net profit | -$0.45 |
| -$2,744 | Net after 1 year | -$463 |
| -$4,720 | Net after 2 years | -$628 |
| -$6,696 | Net after 3 years | -$792 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell SC-BOXScore: 33/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC-BOX222.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iBeLink BM-S1 or Goldshell SC-BOX more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell SC-BOX is more profitable at $-0.45/day compared to $-5.41/day for the iBeLink BM-S1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iBeLink BM-S1 vs Goldshell SC-BOX: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the iBeLink BM-S1 or Goldshell SC-BOX?
The Goldshell SC-BOX scores 33/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the iBeLink BM-S1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iBeLink BM-S1 and Goldshell SC-BOX?
The iBeLink BM-S1 runs at 345.6 J/TH while the Goldshell SC-BOX runs at 222.2 J/TH — a difference of 123.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 36% better efficacité (346 vs 222 J/TH).