iBeLink BM-S3+ vs Goldshell SC6 SE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iBeLink BM-S3+ | Specification | Goldshell SC6 SE |
|---|---|---|
| 25.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 17.0 TH/s |
| 3,400 W | Consommation électrique | 3,300 W |
| 136.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 194.1 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14.0 kg | Weight | 11.5 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b-sia | Algorithme | Blake2b-sia |
| iBeLink | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
iBeLink BM-S3+
Goldshell SC6 SE
Based on BTC price of $73,473 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the iBeLink BM-S3+ edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 47% more hashrate (25.0 vs 17.0 TH/s) in the iBeLink BM-S3+'s favour. The Goldshell SC6 SE claws back ground on consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iBeLink BM-S3+ and Goldshell SC6 SE actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- iBeLink BM-S3+ 47% more hashrate (25.0 vs 17.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell SC6 SE 3% better power draw (3,400 vs 3,300 W)
- iBeLink BM-S3+ 30% better efficacité (136 vs 194 J/TH)
- Goldshell SC6 SE 18% better weight (14.0 vs 11.5 kg)
- iBeLink BM-S3+ 3% more heat output (11,601 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink BM-S3+ 64% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iBeLink BM-S3+ | Metric | Goldshell SC6 SE |
|---|---|---|
| $3,299 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,029 |
| -$7.33 | Daily net profit | -$7.35 |
| -$5,974 | Net after 1 year | -$3,714 |
| -$8,649 | Net after 2 years | -$6,398 |
| -$11,324 | Net after 3 years | -$9,083 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink BM-S3+Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-S3+136.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
iBeLink BM-S3+ vs Goldshell SC6 SE: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iBeLink BM-S3+ is more profitable at $-7.33/day compared to $-7.35/day for the Goldshell SC6 SE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iBeLink BM-S3+ or the Goldshell SC6 SE better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The iBeLink BM-S3+ is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Goldshell SC6 SE at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the iBeLink BM-S3+ or the Goldshell SC6 SE?
The iBeLink BM-S3+ scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell SC6 SE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
iBeLink BM-S3+ vs Goldshell SC6 SE: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iBeLink BM-S3+ runs at 136.0 J/TH while the Goldshell SC6 SE runs at 194.1 J/TH — a difference of 58.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 30% better efficacité (136 vs 194 J/TH).