Ebang Ebit E10 vs Whatsminer M50
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Ebang Ebit E10 | Specification | Whatsminer M50 |
|---|---|---|
| 18.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 114.0 TH/s |
| 1,650 W | Consommation électrique | 3,306 W |
| 91.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 29.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 9.8 kg | Weight | 12.5 kg |
| 5,630 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,280 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| Ebang | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Ebang Ebit E10
Whatsminer M50
Based on BTC price of $64,000 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Whatsminer M50 l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 533% more hashrate (18.0 vs 114.0 TH/s) in the Whatsminer M50's favour. The Ebang Ebit E10 claws back ground on consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Ebang Ebit E10 and Whatsminer M50 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Whatsminer M50 533% more hashrate (18.0 vs 114.0 TH/s)
- Ebang Ebit E10 50% better power draw (1,650 vs 3,306 W)
- Whatsminer M50 68% better efficacité (91.7 vs 29.0 J/TH)
- Ebang Ebit E10 22% better weight (9.8 vs 12.5 kg)
- Whatsminer M50 100% more heat output (5,630 vs 11,280 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M50 29% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Ebang Ebit E10 | Metric | Whatsminer M50 |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,600 |
| -$3.44 | Daily net profit | -$4.63 |
| -$1,255 | Net after 1 year | -$4,291 |
| -$2,510 | Net after 2 years | -$5,983 |
| -$3,766 | Net after 3 years | -$7,674 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M50Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M5029.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Ebang Ebit E10 or Whatsminer M50 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Ebang Ebit E10 is more profitable at $-3.44/day compared to $-4.63/day for the Whatsminer M50. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Ebang Ebit E10 or Whatsminer M50?
The Whatsminer M50 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Ebang Ebit E10 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Ebang Ebit E10 vs Whatsminer M50: which fits a residential setup better?
The Whatsminer M50 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Ebang Ebit E10). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Ebang Ebit E10 vs Whatsminer M50: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Ebang Ebit E10 runs at 91.7 J/TH while the Whatsminer M50 runs at 29.0 J/TH — a difference of 62.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 68% better efficacité (91.7 vs 29.0 J/TH).