Goldshell CK-BOX vs Goldshell CK-LITE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell CK-BOX | Specification | Goldshell CK-LITE |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 6.3 TH/s |
| 215 W | Consommation électrique | 1,200 W |
| 204.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 190.5 J/TH |
| 45 dB | Niveau de bruit | 65 dB |
| 2.0 kg | Weight | 7.5 kg |
| 734 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 59/100 | Home Mining Score | 52/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell CK-BOX
Goldshell CK-LITE
Based on BTC price of $63,866 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell CK-LITE l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 500% more hashrate (1.1 vs 6.3 TH/s). The Goldshell CK-BOX claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell CK-BOX and Goldshell CK-LITE sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell CK-LITE 500% more hashrate (1.1 vs 6.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 82% better power draw (215 vs 1,200 W)
- Goldshell CK-LITE 7% better efficacité (205 vs 190 J/TH)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 31% better noise (45.0 vs 65.0 dB)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 73% better weight (2.0 vs 7.5 kg)
- Goldshell CK-LITE 458% more heat output (734 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 13% more score de minage domestique (59.0 vs 52.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell CK-BOX | Metric | Goldshell CK-LITE |
|---|---|---|
| $399 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $599 |
| -$0.49 | Daily net profit | -$2.70 |
| -$576 | Net after 1 year | -$1,584 |
| -$754 | Net after 2 years | -$2,569 |
| -$931 | Net after 3 years | -$3,553 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell CK-BOXScore: 59/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK-LITE190.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell CK-BOX or the Goldshell CK-LITE?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK-BOX is more profitable at $-0.49/day compared to $-2.70/day for the Goldshell CK-LITE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell CK-BOX or the Goldshell CK-LITE better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell CK-BOX is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Goldshell CK-LITE at 65 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell CK-BOX vs Goldshell CK-LITE: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell CK-BOX scores 59/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 52/100 for the Goldshell CK-LITE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell CK-BOX and Goldshell CK-LITE on J/TH?
The Goldshell CK-BOX runs at 204.8 J/TH while the Goldshell CK-LITE runs at 190.5 J/TH — a difference of 14.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 7% better efficacité (205 vs 190 J/TH).