Goldshell KD-BOX Pro vs Iceriver KS2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell KD-BOX Pro | Specification | Iceriver KS2 |
|---|---|---|
| 2.6 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.0 TH/s |
| 75 W | Consommation électrique | 1,200 W |
| 28.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 1.1 kg | Weight | 14.9 kg |
| 256 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 45/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell KD-BOX Pro
Iceriver KS2
Based on BTC price of $64,000 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 95% better efficacité (28.9 vs 600.0 J/TH). That said, the Iceriver KS2 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro and Iceriver KS2 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 30% more hashrate (2.6 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 94% better power draw (75.0 vs 1,200.0 W)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 95% better efficacité (28.9 vs 600.0 J/TH)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 53% better noise (35.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 93% better weight (1.1 vs 14.9 kg)
- Iceriver KS2 1500% more heat output (256 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell KD-BOX Pro 58% more score de minage domestique (71.0 vs 45.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell KD-BOX Pro | Metric | Iceriver KS2 |
|---|---|---|
| $699 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $399 |
| -$0.10 | Daily net profit | -$2.82 |
| -$737 | Net after 1 year | -$1,429 |
| -$775 | Net after 2 years | -$2,459 |
| -$814 | Net after 3 years | -$3,489 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell KD-BOX ProScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KD-BOX Pro28.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro or Iceriver KS2 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro is more profitable at $-0.10/day compared to $-2.82/day for the Iceriver KS2. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell KD-BOX Pro vs Iceriver KS2: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell KD-BOX Pro is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Iceriver KS2 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell KD-BOX Pro or Iceriver KS2?
The Goldshell KD-BOX Pro scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 45/100 for the Iceriver KS2). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell KD-BOX Pro vs Iceriver KS2: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell KD-BOX Pro runs at 28.9 J/TH while the Iceriver KS2 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 571.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 95% better efficacité (28.9 vs 600.0 J/TH).