Goldshell HS3-SE vs Goldshell SC6 SE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell HS3-SE | Specification | Goldshell SC6 SE |
|---|---|---|
| 930.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 17.0 TH/s |
| 930 W | Consommation électrique | 3,300 W |
| 1,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 194.1 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 7.3 kg | Weight | 11.5 kg |
| 3,173 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b-sia | Algorithme | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell HS3-SE
Goldshell SC6 SE
Based on BTC price of $73,473 and current network difficulty as of May 30, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell SC6 SE l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 1728% more hashrate (0.9 vs 17.0 TH/s). The Goldshell HS3-SE holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell HS3-SE and Goldshell SC6 SE sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell SC6 SE 1728% more hashrate (0.9 vs 17.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell HS3-SE 72% better power draw (930 vs 3,300 W)
- Goldshell SC6 SE 81% better efficacité (1,000 vs 194 J/TH)
- Goldshell HS3-SE 37% better weight (7.3 vs 11.5 kg)
- Goldshell SC6 SE 255% more heat output (3,173 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell HS3-SE 41% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell HS3-SE | Metric | Goldshell SC6 SE |
|---|---|---|
| $1,700 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,029 |
| -$2.20 | Daily net profit | -$7.35 |
| -$2,503 | Net after 1 year | -$3,714 |
| -$3,307 | Net after 2 years | -$6,398 |
| -$4,110 | Net after 3 years | -$9,083 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell HS3-SEScore: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC6 SE194.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell HS3-SE vs Goldshell SC6 SE: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS3-SE is more profitable at $-2.20/day compared to $-7.35/day for the Goldshell SC6 SE. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell HS3-SE or Goldshell SC6 SE?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Goldshell HS3-SE vs Goldshell SC6 SE: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell HS3-SE scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell SC6 SE). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell HS3-SE vs Goldshell SC6 SE: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell HS3-SE runs at 1,000.0 J/TH while the Goldshell SC6 SE runs at 194.1 J/TH — a difference of 805.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 81% better efficacité (1,000 vs 194 J/TH).