Passer au contenu

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)

Taux de hachage 137.0 GH/s Puissance 3 W Efficiency 18.3 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+

Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+

Taux de hachage 33.0 TH/s Puissance 2,600 W Efficiency 78.8 J/TH

Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) Specification Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+
137.0 GH/s Taux de hachage 33.0 TH/s
3 W Consommation électrique 2,600 W
18.3 J/TH Efficiency 78.8 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
Weight 10.0 kg
9 BTU/hr BTU Output 8,871 BTU/hr
Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Intel Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)

Daily Revenue 0.00000006 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.01
Daily Profit -$0.00
Monthly -$0.06
Yearly -$0.78

Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+

Daily Revenue 0.00001493 BTC $0.93
Daily Electricity -$6.24
Daily Profit -$5.31
Monthly -$159.20
Yearly -$1,936.88

Based on BTC price of $62,527 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 4 (efficacité, consommation électrique). The standout gap is 100% better power draw (2.5 vs 2,600.0 W) in the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)'s favour. The Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ claws back ground on hashrate and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) — l'emporte sur 2 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) and Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ 23988% more hashrate (0.1 vs 33.0 TH/s)
  • Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) 100% better power draw (2.5 vs 2,600.0 W)
  • Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) 77% better efficacité (18.3 vs 78.8 J/TH)
  • Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ 104267% more heat output (8.5 vs 8,871.2 BTU/hr)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+

Score: 22/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)

18.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) is more profitable at $0.00/day compared to $-5.31/day for the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) or Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) or the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+?

The Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ scores 22/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 0/100 for the Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) vs Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Intel BZM2 (Bonanza Mine 2) runs at 18.3 J/TH while the Innosilicon T2 Turbo HF+ runs at 78.8 J/TH — a difference of 60.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 77% better efficacité (18.3 vs 78.8 J/TH).