MicroBT Whatsminer M10 vs Whatsminer M30S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Quick verdict
For most buyers the Whatsminer M30S is the stronger pick — it leads on 4 of 6 head-to-head factors. The MicroBT Whatsminer M10 runs 33.0 TH/s at 65 J/TH; the Whatsminer M30S runs 88.0 TH/s at 38 J/TH.
Specs verified against the D-Central Mining Bible \xc2\xb7 June 2026
Specifications Comparison
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10 | Specification | Whatsminer M30S |
|---|---|---|
| 33.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 88.0 TH/s |
| 2,145 W | Consommation électrique | 3,344 W |
| 65.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 38.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 8.6 kg | Weight | 11.5 kg |
| 7,319 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,410 BTU/hr |
| 11/100 | Home Mining Score | 8/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| MicroBT | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
MicroBT Whatsminer M10
Whatsminer M30S
Based on BTC price of $64,322 and current network difficulty as of Jun 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Whatsminer M30S, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 167% more hashrate (33.0 vs 88.0 TH/s). The MicroBT Whatsminer M10 holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and operating-cost table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 and Whatsminer M30S actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Whatsminer M30S 167% more hashrate (33.0 vs 88.0 TH/s)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10 36% better power draw (2,145 vs 3,344 W)
- Whatsminer M30S 42% better efficacité (65.0 vs 38.0 J/TH)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10 25% better weight (8.6 vs 11.5 kg)
- Whatsminer M30S 56% more heat output (7,319 vs 11,410 BTU/hr)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10 38% more score de minage domestique (11.0 vs 8.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10 | Metric | Whatsminer M30S |
|---|---|---|
| $2,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,500 |
| -$4.08 | Daily net profit | -$5.18 |
| -$3,989 | Net after 1 year | -$3,390 |
| -$5,478 | Net after 2 years | -$5,280 |
| -$6,968 | Net after 3 years | -$7,169 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
MicroBT Whatsminer M10Score: 11/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M30S38.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Foire aux questions
Which makes more money, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 or the Whatsminer M30S?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 is more profitable at $-4.08/day compared to $-5.18/day for the Whatsminer M30S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 or Whatsminer M30S?
The Whatsminer M30S is quieter at 75 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
MicroBT Whatsminer M10 vs Whatsminer M30S: which fits a residential setup better?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10 scores 11/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 8/100 for the Whatsminer M30S). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the MicroBT Whatsminer M10 and Whatsminer M30S on J/TH?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10 runs at 65.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M30S runs at 38.0 J/TH — a difference of 27.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 42% better efficacité (65.0 vs 38.0 J/TH).