Whatsminer M50S++ vs Whatsminer M63S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Whatsminer M50S++ | Specification | Whatsminer M63S |
|---|---|---|
| 160.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 390.0 TH/s |
| 3,520 W | Consommation électrique | 7,215 W |
| 22.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 18.5 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 28.0 kg |
| 12,010 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 24,618 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| MicroBT | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
Whatsminer M50S++
Whatsminer M63S
Based on BTC price of $63,866 and current network difficulty as of Jun 4, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Whatsminer M63S l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 144% more hashrate (160 vs 390 TH/s). The Whatsminer M50S++ holds the edge in consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Whatsminer M50S++ and Whatsminer M63S diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Whatsminer M63S 144% more hashrate (160 vs 390 TH/s)
- Whatsminer M50S++ 51% better power draw (3,520 vs 7,215 W)
- Whatsminer M63S 16% better efficacité (22.0 vs 18.5 J/TH)
- Whatsminer M63S 33% better noise (75.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Whatsminer M50S++ 52% better weight (13.5 vs 28.0 kg)
- Whatsminer M63S 105% more heat output (12,010 vs 24,618 BTU/hr)
- Whatsminer M63S 47% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Whatsminer M50S++ | Metric | Whatsminer M63S |
|---|---|---|
| $4,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $12,000 |
| -$3.83 | Daily net profit | -$6.05 |
| -$5,396 | Net after 1 year | -$14,207 |
| -$6,792 | Net after 2 years | -$16,415 |
| -$8,188 | Net after 3 years | -$18,622 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Whatsminer M63SScore: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Whatsminer M63S18.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Whatsminer M50S++ or the Whatsminer M63S?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Whatsminer M50S++ is more profitable at $-3.83/day compared to $-6.05/day for the Whatsminer M63S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Whatsminer M50S++ vs Whatsminer M63S: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Whatsminer M63S is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Whatsminer M50S++ at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Whatsminer M50S++ or the Whatsminer M63S?
The Whatsminer M63S scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Whatsminer M50S++). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Whatsminer M50S++ and Whatsminer M63S?
The Whatsminer M50S++ runs at 22.0 J/TH while the Whatsminer M63S runs at 18.5 J/TH — a difference of 3.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 16% better efficacité (22.0 vs 18.5 J/TH).