Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)

Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)

Hashrate 500.0 MH/s Power 750 W Efficiency 1,500,000.0 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon T3+ 52T

Innosilicon T3+ 52T

Hashrate 52.0 TH/s Power 2,800 W Efficiency 53.9 J/TH

Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) vs Innosilicon T3+ 52T

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) Specification Innosilicon T3+ 52T
500.0 MH/s Hashrate 52.0 TH/s
750 W Power Consumption 2,800 W
1,500,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 53.9 J/TH
Noise Level
8,100.0 kg Weight 10,000.0 kg
2,559 BTU/hr BTU Output 9,554 BTU/hr
30/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
Etchash Algorithm SHA-256
Innosilicon Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.80
Daily Profit -$1.80
Monthly -$54.00
Yearly -$656.99

Innosilicon T3+ 52T

Daily Revenue 0.00002393 BTC $1.89
Daily Electricity -$6.72
Daily Profit -$4.83
Monthly -$144.82
Yearly -$1,762.02

Based on BTC price of $79,088 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Innosilicon T3+ 52T, which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 10399900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 52.0 TH/s). That said, the Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Innosilicon T3+ 52T — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) and Innosilicon T3+ 52T sit on each measurable spec:

  • Innosilicon T3+ 52T 10399900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 52.0 TH/s)
  • Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) 73% better power draw (750 vs 2,800 W)
  • Innosilicon T3+ 52T 100% better efficiency (1,500,000.0 vs 53.9 J/TH)
  • Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) 19% better weight (8,100 vs 10,000 kg)
  • Innosilicon T3+ 52T 273% more heat output (2,559 vs 9,554 BTU/hr)
  • Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) 36% more home mining score (30.0 vs 22.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) Metric Innosilicon T3+ 52T
$2,150 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$1.80 Daily net profit -$4.83
-$2,807 Net after 1 year -$1,762
-$3,464 Net after 2 years -$3,524
-$4,121 Net after 3 years -$5,286
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)

Score: 30/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Innosilicon T3+ 52T

53.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) vs Innosilicon T3+ 52T: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) is more profitable at $-1.80/day compared to $-4.83/day for the Innosilicon T3+ 52T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) or the Innosilicon T3+ 52T better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Which is better for home mining, the Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) or Innosilicon T3+ 52T?

The Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Innosilicon T3+ 52T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) and Innosilicon T3+ 52T on J/TH?

The Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) runs at 1,500,000.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T3+ 52T runs at 53.9 J/TH — a difference of 1,499,946.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (1,500,000.0 vs 53.9 J/TH).