Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)

Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)

Hashrate 750.0 MH/s Power 1,350 W Efficiency 1,800,000.0 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon T3+ 52T

Innosilicon T3+ 52T

Hashrate 52.0 TH/s Power 2,800 W Efficiency 53.9 J/TH

Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) vs Innosilicon T3+ 52T

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) Specification Innosilicon T3+ 52T
750.0 MH/s Hashrate 52.0 TH/s
1,350 W Power Consumption 2,800 W
1,800,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 53.9 J/TH
Noise Level
8,100.0 kg Weight 10,000.0 kg
4,606 BTU/hr BTU Output 9,554 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithm SHA-256
Innosilicon Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$3.24
Daily Profit -$3.24
Monthly -$97.20
Yearly -$1,182.59

Innosilicon T3+ 52T

Daily Revenue 0.00002393 BTC $1.89
Daily Electricity -$6.72
Daily Profit -$4.83
Monthly -$144.83
Yearly -$1,762.08

Based on BTC price of $79,081 and current network difficulty as of May 15, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Innosilicon T3+ 52T, which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate). The standout gap is 6933233% more hashrate (0.0 vs 52.0 TH/s) in the Innosilicon T3+ 52T's favour. The Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Innosilicon T3+ 52T — wins on 2 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) and Innosilicon T3+ 52T sit on each measurable spec:

  • Innosilicon T3+ 52T 6933233% more hashrate (0.0 vs 52.0 TH/s)
  • Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) 52% better power draw (1,350 vs 2,800 W)
  • Innosilicon T3+ 52T 100% better efficiency (1,800,000.0 vs 53.9 J/TH)
  • Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) 19% better weight (8,100 vs 10,000 kg)
  • Innosilicon T3+ 52T 107% more heat output (4,606 vs 9,554 BTU/hr)
  • Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) 41% more home mining score (31.0 vs 22.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) Metric Innosilicon T3+ 52T
$800 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$3.24 Daily net profit -$4.83
-$1,983 Net after 1 year -$1,762
-$3,165 Net after 2 years -$3,524
-$4,348 Net after 3 years -$5,286
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Innosilicon T3+ 52T

53.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) or the Innosilicon T3+ 52T?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) is more profitable at $-3.24/day compared to $-4.83/day for the Innosilicon T3+ 52T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) or the Innosilicon T3+ 52T better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) or the Innosilicon T3+ 52T?

The Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Innosilicon T3+ 52T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) and Innosilicon T3+ 52T on J/TH?

The Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh) runs at 1,800,000.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon T3+ 52T runs at 53.9 J/TH — a difference of 1,799,946.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (1,800,000.0 vs 53.9 J/TH).