Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)

Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)

Hashrate 500.0 MH/s Power 750 W Efficiency 1,500,000.0 J/TH
VS
Jasminer X4-1U

Jasminer X4-1U

Hashrate 520.0 MH/s Power 240 W Efficiency 461,538.5 J/TH

Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) vs Jasminer X4-1U

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) Specification Jasminer X4-1U
500.0 MH/s Hashrate 520.0 MH/s
750 W Power Consumption 240 W
1,500,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 461,538.5 J/TH
Noise Level
8,100.0 kg Weight
2,559 BTU/hr BTU Output 819 BTU/hr
30/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
Etchash Algorithm Etchash
Innosilicon Manufacturer Jasminer

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.80
Daily Profit -$1.80
Monthly -$54.00
Yearly -$656.99

Jasminer X4-1U

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.58
Daily Profit -$0.58
Monthly -$17.28
Yearly -$210.23

Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Jasminer X4-1U comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 4 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 69% better efficiency (1,500,000 vs 461,538 J/TH). Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Jasminer X4-1U — wins on 4 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

The Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) and Jasminer X4-1U diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Jasminer X4-1U 4% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Jasminer X4-1U 68% better power draw (750 vs 240 W)
  • Jasminer X4-1U 69% better efficiency (1,500,000 vs 461,538 J/TH)
  • Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) 212% more heat output (2,559 vs 819 BTU/hr)
  • Jasminer X4-1U 3% more home mining score (30.0 vs 31.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) Metric Jasminer X4-1U
$2,150 Upfront cost (MSRP) $209
-$1.80 Daily net profit -$0.58
-$2,807 Net after 1 year -$419
-$3,464 Net after 2 years -$629
-$4,121 Net after 3 years -$840
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Jasminer X4-1U

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Jasminer X4-1U

461,538.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) or Jasminer X4-1U more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X4-1U is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-1.80/day for the Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) vs Jasminer X4-1U: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) vs Jasminer X4-1U: which fits a residential setup better?

The Jasminer X4-1U scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) and Jasminer X4-1U on J/TH?

The Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh) runs at 1,500,000.0 J/TH while the Jasminer X4-1U runs at 461,538.5 J/TH — a difference of 1,038,461.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 69% better efficiency (1,500,000 vs 461,538 J/TH).