Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)

Hashrate 500.0 MH/s Power 960 W Efficiency 1,920,000.0 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon A9 ZMaster

Innosilicon A9 ZMaster

Hashrate 50.0 Ksol/s Power 620 W Efficiency 12.4 J/TH

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A9 ZMaster

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) Specification Innosilicon A9 ZMaster
500.0 MH/s Hashrate 50.0 Ksol/s
960 W Power Consumption 620 W
1,920,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 12.4 J/TH
Noise Level
8,100.0 kg Weight 5,920.0 kg
3,276 BTU/hr BTU Output 2,115 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithm Equihash
Innosilicon Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$2.30
Daily Profit -$2.30
Monthly -$69.12
Yearly -$840.95

Innosilicon A9 ZMaster

Daily Revenue 0.00002301 BTC $1.80
Daily Electricity -$1.49
Daily Profit $0.31
Monthly $9.36
Yearly $113.82

Based on BTC price of $78,223 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Innosilicon A9 ZMaster, which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption). The standout gap is 100% better efficiency (1,920,000.0 vs 12.4 J/TH) in the Innosilicon A9 ZMaster's favour. The Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) claws back ground on home mining score. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Innosilicon A9 ZMaster — wins on 3 of 4 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) and Innosilicon A9 ZMaster sit on each measurable spec:

  • Innosilicon A9 ZMaster 9999900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 50.0 TH/s)
  • Innosilicon A9 ZMaster 35% better power draw (960 vs 620 W)
  • Innosilicon A9 ZMaster 100% better efficiency (1,920,000.0 vs 12.4 J/TH)
  • Innosilicon A9 ZMaster 27% better weight (8,100 vs 5,920 kg)
  • Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) 55% more heat output (3,276 vs 2,115 BTU/hr)
  • Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) 3% more home mining score (31.0 vs 30.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) Metric Innosilicon A9 ZMaster
$469 Upfront cost (MSRP)
-$2.30 Daily net profit $0.31
-$1,310 Net after 1 year +$114
-$2,151 Net after 2 years +$228
-$2,992 Net after 3 years +$341
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Innosilicon A9 ZMaster

$2.62/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Innosilicon A9 ZMaster

12.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A9 ZMaster: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon A9 ZMaster is more profitable at $0.31/day compared to $-2.30/day for the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) or Innosilicon A9 ZMaster?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs Innosilicon A9 ZMaster: which fits a residential setup better?

The Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Innosilicon A9 ZMaster). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) and Innosilicon A9 ZMaster on J/TH?

The Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) runs at 1,920,000.0 J/TH while the Innosilicon A9 ZMaster runs at 12.4 J/TH — a difference of 1,919,987.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (1,920,000.0 vs 12.4 J/TH).