Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)

Hashrate 500.0 MH/s Power 960 W Efficiency 1,920,000.0 J/TH
VS
iPollo V1 Mini

iPollo V1 Mini

Hashrate 300.0 MH/s Power 240 W Efficiency 800,000.0 J/TH

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs iPollo V1 Mini

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) Specification iPollo V1 Mini
500.0 MH/s Hashrate 300.0 MH/s
960 W Power Consumption 240 W
1,920,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 800,000.0 J/TH
Noise Level
8,100.0 kg Weight 2,100.0 kg
3,276 BTU/hr BTU Output 819 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithm EtHash
Innosilicon Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$2.30
Daily Profit -$2.30
Monthly -$69.12
Yearly -$840.95

iPollo V1 Mini

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.58
Daily Profit -$0.58
Monthly -$17.28
Yearly -$210.24

Based on BTC price of $78,257 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the iPollo V1 Mini comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 3 (efficiency, power consumption). Where it pulls away hardest is 75% better power draw (960 vs 240 W). The Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) holds the edge in price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: iPollo V1 Mini — wins on 2 of 3 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) and iPollo V1 Mini actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) 67% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • iPollo V1 Mini 75% better power draw (960 vs 240 W)
  • iPollo V1 Mini 58% better efficiency (1,920,000 vs 800,000 J/TH)
  • iPollo V1 Mini 74% better weight (8,100 vs 2,100 kg)
  • Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) 300% more heat output (3,276 vs 819 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) Metric iPollo V1 Mini
$469 Upfront cost (MSRP) $300
-$2.30 Daily net profit -$0.58
-$1,310 Net after 1 year -$510
-$2,151 Net after 2 years -$720
-$2,992 Net after 3 years -$931
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo V1 Mini

800,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs iPollo V1 Mini: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-2.30/day for the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) vs iPollo V1 Mini: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) or the iPollo V1 Mini?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

How far apart are the Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) and iPollo V1 Mini on J/TH?

The Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh) runs at 1,920,000.0 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Mini runs at 800,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,120,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 58% better efficiency (1,920,000 vs 800,000 J/TH).