Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Jasminer X16-Q
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) | Specification | Jasminer X16-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 1.5 GH/s | Hashrate | 1,950.0 MH/s |
| 2,350 W | Power Consumption | 620 W |
| 1,566,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 317,948.7 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 40 dB |
| — | Weight | 10.0 kg |
| 8,018 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,115 BTU/hr |
| 26/100 | Home Mining Score | 65/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| Innosilicon | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)
Jasminer X16-Q
Based on BTC price of $78,158 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Jasminer X16-Q comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 80% better efficiency (1,566,667 vs 317,949 J/TH). The Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) claws back ground on price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) and Jasminer X16-Q sit on each measurable spec:
- Jasminer X16-Q 30% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Jasminer X16-Q 74% better power draw (2,350 vs 620 W)
- Jasminer X16-Q 80% better efficiency (1,566,667 vs 317,949 J/TH)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) 279% more heat output (8,018 vs 2,115 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X16-Q 150% more home mining score (26.0 vs 65.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) | Metric | Jasminer X16-Q |
|---|---|---|
| $1,200 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,500 |
| -$5.64 | Daily net profit | -$1.49 |
| -$3,259 | Net after 1 year | -$4,043 |
| -$5,317 | Net after 2 years | -$4,586 |
| -$7,376 | Net after 3 years | -$5,129 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X16-QScore: 65/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-Q317,948.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Jasminer X16-Q: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X16-Q is more profitable at $-1.49/day compared to $-5.64/day for the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) or the Jasminer X16-Q better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Jasminer X16-Q is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Jasminer X16-Q: which fits a residential setup better?
The Jasminer X16-Q scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Jasminer X16-Q: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) runs at 1,566,666.7 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-Q runs at 317,948.7 J/TH — a difference of 1,248,718.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 80% better efficiency (1,566,667 vs 317,949 J/TH).
Compare Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) with...
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 ETHMaster (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 Pro ETH (500Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A10 Pro+ ETH (750Mh)
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A11 Pro
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A4 Dominator
- Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs Innosilicon A4+ LTCMaster