Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)

Hashrate 1.5 GH/s Power 2,350 W Efficiency 1,566,666.7 J/TH
VS
iPollo V2H

iPollo V2H

Hashrate 3.4 GH/s Power 475 W Efficiency 139,705.9 J/TH

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs iPollo V2H

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) Specification iPollo V2H
1.5 GH/s Hashrate 3.4 GH/s
2,350 W Power Consumption 475 W
1,566,666.7 J/TH Efficiency 139,705.9 J/TH
Noise Level 65 dB
Weight 7.9 kg
8,018 BTU/hr BTU Output 1,621 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score 55/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithm EtHash
Innosilicon Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$5.64
Daily Profit -$5.64
Monthly -$169.20
Yearly -$2,058.58

iPollo V2H

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.14
Daily Profit -$1.14
Monthly -$34.20
Yearly -$416.06

Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the iPollo V2H, which leads on 6 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 91% better efficiency (1,566,667 vs 139,706 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: iPollo V2H — wins on 6 of 6 factors

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) and iPollo V2H actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • iPollo V2H 127% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • iPollo V2H 80% better power draw (2,350 vs 475 W)
  • iPollo V2H 91% better efficiency (1,566,667 vs 139,706 J/TH)
  • Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) 395% more heat output (8,018 vs 1,621 BTU/hr)
  • iPollo V2H 112% more home mining score (26.0 vs 55.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) Metric iPollo V2H
$1,200 Upfront cost (MSRP) $1,850
-$5.64 Daily net profit -$1.14
-$3,259 Net after 1 year -$2,266
-$5,317 Net after 2 years -$2,682
-$7,376 Net after 3 years -$3,098
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

iPollo V2H

Score: 55/100. 65 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo V2H

139,705.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) or iPollo V2H more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V2H is more profitable at $-1.14/day compared to $-5.64/day for the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) vs iPollo V2H: which runs at a lower noise level?

The iPollo V2H is quieter at 65 dB compared to the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) or iPollo V2H?

The iPollo V2H scores 55/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) and iPollo V2H?

The Innosilicon A11 Pro ETH (1500Mh) runs at 1,566,666.7 J/TH while the iPollo V2H runs at 139,705.9 J/TH — a difference of 1,426,960.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 91% better efficiency (1,566,667 vs 139,706 J/TH).