iPollo V1 Classic vs iPollo V2H
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 Classic | Specification | iPollo V2H |
|---|---|---|
| 1.6 GH/s | Hashrate | 3.4 GH/s |
| 1,240 W | Power Consumption | 475 W |
| 800,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 139,705.9 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 65 dB |
| 13,000.0 kg | Weight | 7.9 kg |
| 4,231 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,621 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 55/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Etchash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1 Classic
iPollo V2H
Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the iPollo V2H comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 83% better efficiency (800,000 vs 139,706 J/TH). That said, the iPollo V1 Classic isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins price-performance. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The iPollo V1 Classic and iPollo V2H diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- iPollo V2H 119% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V2H 62% better power draw (1,240 vs 475 W)
- iPollo V2H 83% better efficiency (800,000 vs 139,706 J/TH)
- iPollo V2H 100% better weight (13,000.0 vs 7.9 kg)
- iPollo V1 Classic 161% more heat output (4,231 vs 1,621 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V2H 77% more home mining score (31.0 vs 55.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iPollo V1 Classic | Metric | iPollo V2H |
|---|---|---|
| $369 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,850 |
| -$2.98 | Daily net profit | -$1.14 |
| -$1,455 | Net after 1 year | -$2,266 |
| -$2,541 | Net after 2 years | -$2,682 |
| -$3,628 | Net after 3 years | -$3,098 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V2HScore: 55/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo V2H139,705.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the iPollo V1 Classic or the iPollo V2H?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V2H is more profitable at $-1.14/day compared to $-2.98/day for the iPollo V1 Classic. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iPollo V1 Classic vs iPollo V2H: which runs at a lower noise level?
The iPollo V2H is quieter at 65 dB compared to the iPollo V1 Classic at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the iPollo V1 Classic or the iPollo V2H?
The iPollo V2H scores 55/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the iPollo V1 Classic). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
iPollo V1 Classic vs iPollo V2H: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iPollo V1 Classic runs at 800,000.0 J/TH while the iPollo V2H runs at 139,705.9 J/TH — a difference of 660,294.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 83% better efficiency (800,000 vs 139,706 J/TH).