iPollo V1 vs iPollo V2H
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 | Specification | iPollo V2H |
|---|---|---|
| 3.6 GH/s | Hashrate | 3.4 GH/s |
| 3,100 W | Power Consumption | 475 W |
| 861,111.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 139,705.9 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 65 dB |
| 13,000.0 kg | Weight | 7.9 kg |
| 10,577 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,621 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 55/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1
iPollo V2H
Based on BTC price of $78,198 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the iPollo V2H edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 85% better power draw (3,100 vs 475 W). That said, the iPollo V1 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins price-performance. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The iPollo V1 and iPollo V2H diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- iPollo V1 6% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V2H 85% better power draw (3,100 vs 475 W)
- iPollo V2H 84% better efficiency (861,111 vs 139,706 J/TH)
- iPollo V2H 100% better weight (13,000.0 vs 7.9 kg)
- iPollo V1 553% more heat output (10,577 vs 1,621 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V2H 150% more home mining score (22.0 vs 55.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iPollo V1 | Metric | iPollo V2H |
|---|---|---|
| $1,699 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,850 |
| -$7.44 | Daily net profit | -$1.14 |
| -$4,415 | Net after 1 year | -$2,266 |
| -$7,130 | Net after 2 years | -$2,682 |
| -$9,846 | Net after 3 years | -$3,098 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V2HScore: 55/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo V2H139,705.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iPollo V1 or iPollo V2H more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V2H is more profitable at $-1.14/day compared to $-7.44/day for the iPollo V1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iPollo V1 or the iPollo V2H better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The iPollo V2H is quieter at 65 dB compared to the iPollo V1 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
iPollo V1 vs iPollo V2H: which fits a residential setup better?
The iPollo V2H scores 55/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iPollo V1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
iPollo V1 vs iPollo V2H: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The iPollo V1 runs at 861,111.1 J/TH while the iPollo V2H runs at 139,705.9 J/TH — a difference of 721,405.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 84% better efficiency (861,111 vs 139,706 J/TH).