Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

iPollo G1

iPollo G1

Hashrate 36.0 GH/s Power 2,800 W Efficiency 77,777.8 J/TH
VS
iPollo V2H

iPollo V2H

Hashrate 3.4 GH/s Power 475 W Efficiency 139,705.9 J/TH

iPollo G1 vs iPollo V2H

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iPollo G1 Specification iPollo V2H
36.0 GH/s Hashrate 3.4 GH/s
2,800 W Power Consumption 475 W
77,777.8 J/TH Efficiency 139,705.9 J/TH
Noise Level 65 dB
19,000.0 kg Weight 7.9 kg
9,554 BTU/hr BTU Output 1,621 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 55/100
Release Year
Cuckatoo32 Algorithm EtHash
iPollo Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iPollo G1

Daily Revenue 0.00000002 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$6.72
Daily Profit -$6.72
Monthly -$201.56
Yearly -$2,452.33

iPollo V2H

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.14
Daily Profit -$1.14
Monthly -$34.20
Yearly -$416.06

Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the iPollo G1 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). The standout gap is 959% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the iPollo G1's favour. That said, the iPollo V2H isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: iPollo G1 — wins on 3 of 6 factors

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iPollo G1 and iPollo V2H sit on each measurable spec:

  • iPollo G1 959% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • iPollo V2H 83% better power draw (2,800 vs 475 W)
  • iPollo G1 44% better efficiency (77,778 vs 139,706 J/TH)
  • iPollo V2H 100% better weight (19,000.0 vs 7.9 kg)
  • iPollo G1 489% more heat output (9,554 vs 1,621 BTU/hr)
  • iPollo V2H 150% more home mining score (22.0 vs 55.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

iPollo G1 Metric iPollo V2H
$1,599 Upfront cost (MSRP) $1,850
-$6.72 Daily net profit -$1.14
-$4,051 Net after 1 year -$2,266
-$6,504 Net after 2 years -$2,682
-$8,956 Net after 3 years -$3,098
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

iPollo V2H

Score: 55/100. 65 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo G1

77,777.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the iPollo G1 or the iPollo V2H?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V2H is more profitable at $-1.14/day compared to $-6.72/day for the iPollo G1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the iPollo G1 or iPollo V2H?

The iPollo V2H is quieter at 65 dB compared to the iPollo G1 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the iPollo G1 or iPollo V2H?

The iPollo V2H scores 55/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iPollo G1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the iPollo G1 and iPollo V2H on J/TH?

The iPollo G1 runs at 77,777.8 J/TH while the iPollo V2H runs at 139,705.9 J/TH — a difference of 61,928.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 44% better efficiency (77,778 vs 139,706 J/TH).