Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell HS-BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Specification | Goldshell HS-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 37.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 470.0 GH/s |
| 360 W | Power Consumption | 230 W |
| 9,729,729.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 489.4 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 2.3 kg | Weight | 2.0 kg |
| 1,228 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 785 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 66/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | HNS & SC |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX
Goldshell HS-BOX
Based on BTC price of $77,152 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell HS-BOX, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better efficiency (9,729,730 vs 489 J/TH). The Goldshell AE-BOX claws back ground on home mining score. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell HS-BOX sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell HS-BOX 1270170% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.5 TH/s)
- Goldshell HS-BOX 36% better power draw (360 vs 230 W)
- Goldshell HS-BOX 100% better efficiency (9,729,730 vs 489 J/TH)
- Goldshell HS-BOX 13% better weight (2.3 vs 2.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 57% more heat output (1,228 vs 785 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 5% more home mining score (69.0 vs 66.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Metric | Goldshell HS-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $299 |
| -$0.86 | Daily net profit | -$0.54 |
| -$415 | Net after 1 year | -$494 |
| -$731 | Net after 2 years | -$690 |
| -$1,046 | Net after 3 years | -$885 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOXScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell HS-BOX489.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX or Goldshell HS-BOX more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS-BOX is more profitable at $-0.54/day compared to $-0.86/day for the Goldshell AE-BOX. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX or the Goldshell HS-BOX better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE-BOX or the Goldshell HS-BOX?
The Goldshell AE-BOX scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 66/100 for the Goldshell HS-BOX). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell HS-BOX: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE-BOX runs at 9,729,729.7 J/TH while the Goldshell HS-BOX runs at 489.4 J/TH — a difference of 9,729,240.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,729,730 vs 489 J/TH).