Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell HS-BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Specification | Goldshell HS-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 470.0 GH/s |
| 530 W | Power Consumption | 230 W |
| 9,814,814.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 489.4 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | 35 dB |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | 2.0 kg |
| 1,808 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 785 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 66/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | HNS & SC |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Goldshell HS-BOX
Based on BTC price of $76,908 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell HS-BOX edges it: 5 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 489 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell HS-BOX actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell HS-BOX 870270% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.5 TH/s)
- Goldshell HS-BOX 57% better power draw (530 vs 230 W)
- Goldshell HS-BOX 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 489 J/TH)
- Goldshell HS-BOX 32% better weight (3.0 vs 2.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 130% more heat output (1,808 vs 785 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell HS-BOX 2% more home mining score (65.0 vs 66.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Metric | Goldshell HS-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $299 |
| -$1.27 | Daily net profit | -$0.54 |
| -$584 | Net after 1 year | -$494 |
| -$1,049 | Net after 2 years | -$690 |
| -$1,513 | Net after 3 years | -$885 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell HS-BOXScore: 66/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell HS-BOX489.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell HS-BOX?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell HS-BOX is more profitable at $-0.54/day compared to $-1.27/day for the Goldshell AE-BOX II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell HS-BOX better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell HS-BOX: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell HS-BOX scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 65/100 for the Goldshell AE-BOX II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell HS-BOX on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH while the Goldshell HS-BOX runs at 489.4 J/TH — a difference of 9,814,325.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,814,815 vs 489 J/TH).