Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Specification | Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 37.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 8.0 TH/s |
| 360 W | Power Consumption | 2,020 W |
| 9,729,729.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 252.5 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | 55 dB |
| 2.3 kg | Weight | 13.1 kg |
| 1,228 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,892 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 54/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake2b-sia |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX
Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th)
Based on BTC price of $76,908 and current network difficulty as of May 18, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) edges it: 2 of 5 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 21621522% more hashrate (0.0 vs 8.0 TH/s). The Goldshell AE-BOX holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) 21621522% more hashrate (0.0 vs 8.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 82% better power draw (360 vs 2,020 W)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) 100% better efficiency (9,729,730 vs 253 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 36% better noise (35.0 vs 55.0 dB)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 82% better weight (2.3 vs 13.1 kg)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) 461% more heat output (1,228 vs 6,892 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX 28% more home mining score (69.0 vs 54.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX | Metric | Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) |
|---|---|---|
| $100 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$0.86 | Daily net profit | -$4.56 |
| -$415 | Net after 1 year | -$1,666 |
| -$731 | Net after 2 years | -$3,332 |
| -$1,046 | Net after 3 years | -$4,999 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOXScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th)252.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX or Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX is more profitable at $-0.86/day compared to $-4.56/day for the Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE-BOX vs Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th): which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE-BOX is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE-BOX or Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th)?
The Goldshell AE-BOX scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 54/100 for the Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE-BOX and Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th)?
The Goldshell AE-BOX runs at 9,729,729.7 J/TH while the Goldshell SC5 Pro (8.8Th) runs at 252.5 J/TH — a difference of 9,729,477.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,729,730 vs 253 J/TH).