Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell AL BOX III
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Card | Specification | Goldshell AL BOX III |
|---|---|---|
| 5.5 MH/s | Hashrate | 1.3 TH/s |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 600 W |
| 11,818,181.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 480.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 0.3 kg | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 222 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,047 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Card
Goldshell AL BOX III
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Goldshell AL BOX III wins on 3 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 22727173% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.3 TH/s). That said, the Goldshell AE Card isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Card and Goldshell AL BOX III sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell AL BOX III 22727173% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE Card 89% better power draw (65.0 vs 600.0 W)
- Goldshell AL BOX III 100% better efficiency (11,818,182 vs 480 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Card 85% better weight (0.3 vs 2.2 kg)
- Goldshell AL BOX III 823% more heat output (222 vs 2,047 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Card 137% more home mining score (71.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Card | Metric | Goldshell AL BOX III |
|---|---|---|
| $99 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $139 |
| -$0.16 | Daily net profit | -$1.40 |
| -$156 | Net after 1 year | -$648 |
| -$213 | Net after 2 years | -$1,157 |
| -$270 | Net after 3 years | -$1,667 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE CardScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AL BOX III480.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Card or the Goldshell AL BOX III?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE Card is more profitable at $-0.16/day compared to $-1.40/day for the Goldshell AL BOX III. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Card or the Goldshell AL BOX III better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE Card is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell AL BOX III at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Card or Goldshell AL BOX III?
The Goldshell AE Card scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Goldshell AL BOX III). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell AL BOX III: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE Card runs at 11,818,181.8 J/TH while the Goldshell AL BOX III runs at 480.0 J/TH — a difference of 11,817,701.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (11,818,182 vs 480 J/TH).