Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell AL BOX III
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell AL BOX III |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 1.3 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Power Consumption | 600 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 480.0 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,047 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell AL BOX III
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell AL BOX III, which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, price-performance). The standout gap is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 480 J/TH) in the Goldshell AL BOX III's favour. The Goldshell AE Max II holds the edge in noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell AL BOX III diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell AL BOX III 231381% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell AL BOX III 81% better power draw (3,200 vs 600 W)
- Goldshell AL BOX III 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 480 J/TH)
- Goldshell AL BOX III 82% better weight (12.5 vs 2.2 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 433% more heat output (10,918 vs 2,047 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AL BOX III 3% more home mining score (29.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell AL BOX III |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $139 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$1.40 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$648 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$1,157 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$1,667 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AL BOX IIIScore: 30/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AL BOX III480.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell AL BOX III: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AL BOX III is more profitable at $-1.40/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell AL BOX III?
The Goldshell AE Max II is quieter at 85 dB compared to the Goldshell AL BOX III at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell AL BOX III?
The Goldshell AL BOX III scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Goldshell AE Max II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell AL BOX III?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell AL BOX III runs at 480.0 J/TH — a difference of 5,925,445.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (5,925,926 vs 480 J/TH).