Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell AL BOX III
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell AL BOX III |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Hashrate | 1.3 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Power Consumption | 600 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 480.0 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 2.2 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,047 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithm | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell AL BOX III
Based on BTC price of $78,167 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Goldshell AL BOX III, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 480 J/TH). The Goldshell AE Max claws back ground on home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell AL BOX III sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell AL BOX III 347122% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell AL BOX III 82% better power draw (3,300 vs 600 W)
- Goldshell AL BOX III 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 480 J/TH)
- Goldshell AL BOX III 84% better weight (13.5 vs 2.2 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 450% more heat output (11,260 vs 2,047 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max 67% more home mining score (50.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell AL BOX III |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $139 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$1.40 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$648 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$1,157 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$1,667 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE MaxScore: 50/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AL BOX III480.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell AL BOX III more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AL BOX III is more profitable at $-1.40/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell AL BOX III better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE Max is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Goldshell AL BOX III at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell AL BOX III: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AE Max scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Goldshell AL BOX III). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell AL BOX III: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell AL BOX III runs at 480.0 J/TH — a difference of 9,166,186.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficiency (9,166,667 vs 480 J/TH).