Bitmain Antminer DR5 (35Th) vs Antminer KS3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer DR5 (35Th) | Specification | Antminer KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| 35.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 9.4 TH/s |
| 1,610 W | Power Consumption | 3,500 W |
| 46.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 372.3 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 7,750.0 kg | Weight | 16.1 kg |
| 5,493 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,942 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake256r14 | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer DR5 (35Th)
Antminer KS3
Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (35Th) comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption). Where it pulls away hardest is 88% better efficiency (46.0 vs 372.3 J/TH). The Antminer KS3 claws back ground on home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (35Th) and Antminer KS3 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer DR5 (35Th) 272% more hashrate (35.0 vs 9.4 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer DR5 (35Th) 54% better power draw (1,610 vs 3,500 W)
- Bitmain Antminer DR5 (35Th) 88% better efficiency (46.0 vs 372.3 J/TH)
- Antminer KS3 100% better weight (7,750.0 vs 16.1 kg)
- Antminer KS3 117% more heat output (5,493 vs 11,942 BTU/hr)
- Antminer KS3 29% more home mining score (28.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer DR5 (35Th) | Metric | Antminer KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $8,000 |
| -$2.61 | Daily net profit | -$8.06 |
| -$951 | Net after 1 year | -$10,943 |
| -$1,902 | Net after 2 years | -$13,885 |
| -$2,853 | Net after 3 years | -$16,828 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer KS3Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer DR5 (35Th)46.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer DR5 (35Th) vs Antminer KS3: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (35Th) is more profitable at $-2.61/day compared to $-8.06/day for the Antminer KS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer DR5 (35Th) vs Antminer KS3: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Antminer KS3 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (35Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (35Th) or the Antminer KS3?
The Antminer KS3 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (35Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer DR5 (35Th) and Antminer KS3?
The Bitmain Antminer DR5 (35Th) runs at 46.0 J/TH while the Antminer KS3 runs at 372.3 J/TH — a difference of 326.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 88% better efficiency (46.0 vs 372.3 J/TH).