Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Bitmain Antminer DR5 (35Th)

Bitmain Antminer DR5 (35Th)

Hashrate 35.0 TH/s Power 1,610 W Efficiency 46.0 J/TH
VS
Antminer K7

Antminer K7

Hashrate 63.5 TH/s Power 3,080 W Efficiency 48.5 J/TH

Bitmain Antminer DR5 (35Th) vs Antminer K7

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitmain Antminer DR5 (35Th) Specification Antminer K7
35.0 TH/s Hashrate 63.5 TH/s
1,610 W Power Consumption 3,080 W
46.0 J/TH Efficiency 48.5 J/TH
Noise Level 75 dB
7,750.0 kg Weight 14.0 kg
5,493 BTU/hr BTU Output 10,509 BTU/hr
28/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
Blake256r14 Algorithm Eaglesong
Bitmain Manufacturer Bitmain

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitmain Antminer DR5 (35Th)

Daily Revenue 0.00001611 BTC $1.26
Daily Electricity -$3.86
Daily Profit -$2.61
Monthly -$78.16
Yearly -$950.99

Antminer K7

Daily Revenue 0.00002922 BTC $2.28
Daily Electricity -$7.39
Daily Profit -$5.11
Monthly -$153.26
Yearly -$1,864.66

Based on BTC price of $78,139 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Scored side by side, the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (35Th) and Antminer K7 trade blows evenly. Neither pulls ahead decisively, so the deciding factor is which spec matters most to your setup — the panels above lay that out.

Spec Deltas

The Bitmain Antminer DR5 (35Th) and Antminer K7 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • Antminer K7 81% more hashrate (35.0 vs 63.5 TH/s)
  • Bitmain Antminer DR5 (35Th) 48% better power draw (1,610 vs 3,080 W)
  • Bitmain Antminer DR5 (35Th) 5% better efficiency (46.0 vs 48.5 J/TH)
  • Antminer K7 100% better weight (7,750.0 vs 14.0 kg)
  • Antminer K7 91% more heat output (5,493 vs 10,509 BTU/hr)
  • Antminer K7 29% more home mining score (28.0 vs 36.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

Bitmain Antminer DR5 (35Th) Metric Antminer K7
Upfront cost (MSRP) $3,500
-$2.61 Daily net profit -$5.11
-$951 Net after 1 year -$5,365
-$1,902 Net after 2 years -$7,229
-$2,853 Net after 3 years -$9,094
Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Antminer K7

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Bitmain Antminer DR5 (35Th)

46.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (35Th) or the Antminer K7?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (35Th) is more profitable at $-2.61/day compared to $-5.11/day for the Antminer K7. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Bitmain Antminer DR5 (35Th) vs Antminer K7: which runs at a lower noise level?

The Antminer K7 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (35Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (35Th) or the Antminer K7?

The Antminer K7 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer DR5 (35Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Bitmain Antminer DR5 (35Th) vs Antminer K7: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Bitmain Antminer DR5 (35Th) runs at 46.0 J/TH while the Antminer K7 runs at 48.5 J/TH — a difference of 2.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 5% better efficiency (46.0 vs 48.5 J/TH).