Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) vs Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) | Specification | Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| 9.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 2.4 GH/s |
| 2,340 W | Power Consumption | 2,556 W |
| 260,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,065,000.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 14,200.0 kg |
| 7,984 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,721 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh)
Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh)
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) wins on 5 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, home mining score, noise level). Where it pulls away hardest is 76% better efficiency (260,000 vs 1,065,000 J/TH). That said, the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) and Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) 275% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) 8% better power draw (2,340 vs 2,556 W)
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) 76% better efficiency (260,000 vs 1,065,000 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) 100% better weight (14.2 vs 14,200.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) 9% more heat output (7,984 vs 8,721 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) 82% more home mining score (40.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) | Metric | Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| $5,399 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,000 |
| -$5.62 | Daily net profit | -$6.13 |
| -$7,449 | Net after 1 year | -$3,239 |
| -$9,498 | Net after 2 years | -$5,478 |
| -$11,548 | Net after 3 years | -$7,717 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh)Score: 40/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh)260,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) or Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) is more profitable at $-5.62/day compared to $-6.13/day for the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) or the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) or the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh)?
The Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) scores 40/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) and Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh)?
The Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) runs at 260,000.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) runs at 1,065,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 805,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 76% better efficiency (260,000 vs 1,065,000 J/TH).