Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) vs iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) | Specification | iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus |
|---|---|---|
| 9.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 400.0 MH/s |
| 2,340 W | Power Consumption | 232 W |
| 260,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 580,000.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Noise Level | — |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 2.4 kg |
| 7,984 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 792 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithm | EtHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh)
iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh), which leads on 5 of 6 weighted factors (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). The standout gap is 2150% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh)'s favour. The iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus holds the edge in power consumption. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) and iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) 2150% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus 90% better power draw (2,340 vs 232 W)
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) 55% better efficiency (260,000 vs 580,000 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus 83% better weight (14.2 vs 2.4 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) 909% more heat output (7,984 vs 792 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) 29% more home mining score (40.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) | Metric | iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus |
|---|---|---|
| $5,399 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $399 |
| -$5.62 | Daily net profit | -$0.56 |
| -$7,449 | Net after 1 year | -$602 |
| -$9,498 | Net after 2 years | -$805 |
| -$11,548 | Net after 3 years | -$1,009 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh)Score: 40/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh)260,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) vs iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus is more profitable at $-0.56/day compared to $-5.62/day for the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) vs iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) is quieter at 75 dB compared to the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) vs iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) scores 40/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) vs iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer E11 (9Gh) runs at 260,000.0 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus runs at 580,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 320,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 55% better efficiency (260,000 vs 580,000 J/TH).