Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) vs iBeLink BM-N1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) | Specification | iBeLink BM-N1 |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1 TH/s | Hashrate | 6.6 TH/s |
| 1,580 W | Power Consumption | 2,400 W |
| 1,398.2 J/TH | Efficiency | 363.6 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 6,100.0 kg | Weight | 9,900.0 kg |
| 5,391 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,189 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh)
iBeLink BM-N1
Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the iBeLink BM-N1 wins on 2 of 4 factors (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 484% more hashrate (1.1 vs 6.6 TH/s). The Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) and iBeLink BM-N1 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- iBeLink BM-N1 484% more hashrate (1.1 vs 6.6 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) 34% better power draw (1,580 vs 2,400 W)
- iBeLink BM-N1 74% better efficiency (1,398 vs 364 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) 38% better weight (6,100 vs 9,900 kg)
- iBeLink BM-N1 52% more heat output (5,391 vs 8,189 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) 8% more home mining score (28.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) | Metric | iBeLink BM-N1 |
|---|---|---|
| $925 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$3.75 | Daily net profit | -$5.52 |
| -$2,294 | Net after 1 year | -$2,016 |
| -$3,663 | Net after 2 years | -$4,031 |
| -$5,033 | Net after 3 years | -$6,047 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh)Score: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-N1363.6 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) or iBeLink BM-N1 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) is more profitable at $-3.75/day compared to $-5.52/day for the iBeLink BM-N1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) or iBeLink BM-N1?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) vs iBeLink BM-N1: which fits a residential setup better?
The Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the iBeLink BM-N1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) and iBeLink BM-N1 on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) runs at 1,398.2 J/TH while the iBeLink BM-N1 runs at 363.6 J/TH — a difference of 1,034.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 74% better efficiency (1,398 vs 364 J/TH).