Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) vs iBeLink BM-N1
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) | Specification | iBeLink BM-N1 |
|---|---|---|
| 58.0 TH/s | Hashrate | 6.6 TH/s |
| 2,813 W | Power Consumption | 2,400 W |
| 48.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 363.6 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 16.1 kg | Weight | 9,900.0 kg |
| 9,598 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 8,189 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithm | Eaglesong |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th)
iBeLink BM-N1
Based on BTC price of $78,208 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) edges it: 2 of 4 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 779% more hashrate (58.0 vs 6.6 TH/s). The iBeLink BM-N1 claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) and iBeLink BM-N1 sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) 779% more hashrate (58.0 vs 6.6 TH/s)
- iBeLink BM-N1 15% better power draw (2,813 vs 2,400 W)
- Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) 87% better efficiency (48.5 vs 363.6 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) 100% better weight (16.1 vs 9,900.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) 17% more heat output (9,598 vs 8,189 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink BM-N1 18% more home mining score (22.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) | Metric | iBeLink BM-N1 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,860 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$4.66 | Daily net profit | -$5.52 |
| -$3,562 | Net after 1 year | -$2,016 |
| -$5,265 | Net after 2 years | -$4,031 |
| -$6,967 | Net after 3 years | -$6,047 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink BM-N1Score: 26/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th)48.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) vs iBeLink BM-N1: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) is more profitable at $-4.66/day compared to $-5.52/day for the iBeLink BM-N1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) vs iBeLink BM-N1: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) vs iBeLink BM-N1: which fits a residential setup better?
The iBeLink BM-N1 scores 26/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) vs iBeLink BM-N1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer K7 (58Th) runs at 48.5 J/TH while the iBeLink BM-N1 runs at 363.6 J/TH — a difference of 315.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 87% better efficiency (48.5 vs 363.6 J/TH).