Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) vs IceRiver KS3M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) | Specification | IceRiver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| 8.3 TH/s | Hashrate | 6.0 TH/s |
| 3,188 W | Power Consumption | 3,400 W |
| 384.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 566.7 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| — | Weight | 14.4 kg |
| 10,878 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,601 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th)
IceRiver KS3M
Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). The standout gap is 32% better efficiency (384 vs 567 J/TH) in the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th)'s favour. The IceRiver KS3M claws back ground on home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) and IceRiver KS3M actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) 38% more hashrate (8.3 vs 6.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) 6% better power draw (3,188 vs 3,400 W)
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) 32% better efficiency (384 vs 567 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS3M 7% more heat output (10,878 vs 11,601 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS3M 64% more home mining score (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) | Metric | IceRiver KS3M |
|---|---|---|
| $3,850 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $8,500 |
| -$7.35 | Daily net profit | -$7.94 |
| -$6,534 | Net after 1 year | -$11,400 |
| -$9,217 | Net after 2 years | -$14,299 |
| -$11,901 | Net after 3 years | -$17,199 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS3MScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th)384.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) or IceRiver KS3M more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) is more profitable at $-7.35/day compared to $-7.94/day for the IceRiver KS3M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) vs IceRiver KS3M: which runs at a lower noise level?
The IceRiver KS3M is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) or IceRiver KS3M?
The IceRiver KS3M scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) and IceRiver KS3M?
The Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) runs at 384.1 J/TH while the IceRiver KS3M runs at 566.7 J/TH — a difference of 182.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 32% better efficiency (384 vs 567 J/TH).