Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) vs Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| 8.3 TH/s | Hashrate | 4.2 TH/s |
| 3,188 W | Power Consumption | 500 W |
| 384.1 J/TH | Efficiency | 119.1 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 50 dB |
| — | Weight | 4.0 kg |
| 10,878 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,706 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 62/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th)
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite
Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, power consumption, home mining score, noise level, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 84% better power draw (3,188 vs 500 W). That said, the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) and Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) 98% more hashrate (8.3 vs 4.2 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 84% better power draw (3,188 vs 500 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 69% better efficiency (384 vs 119 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) 538% more heat output (10,878 vs 1,706 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite 182% more home mining score (22.0 vs 62.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite |
|---|---|---|
| $3,850 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $699 |
| -$7.35 | Daily net profit | -$1.05 |
| -$6,534 | Net after 1 year | -$1,082 |
| -$9,217 | Net after 2 years | -$1,465 |
| -$11,901 | Net after 3 years | -$1,847 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS7 LiteScore: 62/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite119.1 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) or Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite is more profitable at $-1.05/day compared to $-7.35/day for the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) or Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite?
The Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) or Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite?
The Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) and Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer KS3 (8.3Th) runs at 384.1 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS7 Lite runs at 119.1 J/TH — a difference of 265.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 69% better efficiency (384 vs 119 J/TH).