Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) vs IceRiver KS3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) | Specification | IceRiver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| 9.4 TH/s | Hashrate | 8.0 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Power Consumption | 3,200 W |
| 372.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 400.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 17.7 kg | Weight | 14.4 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th)
IceRiver KS3
Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Based on our multi-factor analysis, the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) wins on 3 of 6 factors (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 18% more hashrate (9.4 vs 8.0 TH/s). The IceRiver KS3 holds the edge in power consumption and home mining score and noise level. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) and IceRiver KS3 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) 18% more hashrate (9.4 vs 8.0 TH/s)
- IceRiver KS3 9% better power draw (3,500 vs 3,200 W)
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) 7% better efficiency (372 vs 400 J/TH)
- IceRiver KS3 19% better weight (17.7 vs 14.4 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) 9% more heat output (11,942 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
- IceRiver KS3 64% more home mining score (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) | Metric | IceRiver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| $2,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $10,000 |
| -$8.06 | Daily net profit | -$7.39 |
| -$5,442 | Net after 1 year | -$12,698 |
| -$8,385 | Net after 2 years | -$15,396 |
| -$11,327 | Net after 3 years | -$18,094 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
IceRiver KS3Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th)372.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) vs IceRiver KS3: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the IceRiver KS3 is more profitable at $-7.39/day compared to $-8.06/day for the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) or the IceRiver KS3 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The IceRiver KS3 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) or the IceRiver KS3?
The IceRiver KS3 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) vs IceRiver KS3: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) runs at 372.3 J/TH while the IceRiver KS3 runs at 400.0 J/TH — a difference of 27.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 7% better efficiency (372 vs 400 J/TH).