Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 9.4 TH/s | Hashrate | 200.0 GH/s |
| 3,500 W | Power Consumption | 100 W |
| 372.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 500.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | — |
| 17.7 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th)
Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficiency, hashrate, price-performance). Its biggest concrete edge: 4600% more hashrate (9.4 vs 0.2 TH/s). The Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro claws back ground on power consumption and home mining score. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) and Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) 4600% more hashrate (9.4 vs 0.2 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 97% better power draw (3,500 vs 100 W)
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) 26% better efficiency (372 vs 500 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 86% better weight (17.7 vs 2.5 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) 3400% more heat output (11,942 vs 341 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 64% more home mining score (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $2,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $79 |
| -$8.06 | Daily net profit | -$0.23 |
| -$5,442 | Net after 1 year | -$164 |
| -$8,385 | Net after 2 years | -$249 |
| -$11,327 | Net after 3 years | -$334 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS0 ProScore: 36/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th)372.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) or the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-8.06/day for the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) or the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) or the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro?
The Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) and Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro?
The Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) runs at 372.3 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro runs at 500.0 J/TH — a difference of 127.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 26% better efficiency (372 vs 500 J/TH).