Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) vs Iceriver KS2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) | Specification | Iceriver KS2 |
|---|---|---|
| 9.4 TH/s | Hashrate | 2.0 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Power Consumption | 1,200 W |
| 372.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| — | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| 17.7 kg | Weight | 14.9 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 45/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithm | KHeavyHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th)
Iceriver KS2
Based on BTC price of $78,124 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Scored side by side, the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) and Iceriver KS2 trade blows evenly. Neither pulls ahead decisively, so the deciding factor is which spec matters most to your setup — the panels above lay that out.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) and Iceriver KS2 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) 370% more hashrate (9.4 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS2 66% better power draw (3,500 vs 1,200 W)
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) 38% better efficiency (372 vs 600 J/TH)
- Iceriver KS2 16% better weight (17.7 vs 14.9 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) 192% more heat output (11,942 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KS2 105% more home mining score (22.0 vs 45.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) | Metric | Iceriver KS2 |
|---|---|---|
| $2,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $399 |
| -$8.06 | Daily net profit | -$2.81 |
| -$5,443 | Net after 1 year | -$1,424 |
| -$8,385 | Net after 2 years | -$2,449 |
| -$11,328 | Net after 3 years | -$3,474 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KS2Score: 45/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th)372.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) or Iceriver KS2 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS2 is more profitable at $-2.81/day compared to $-8.06/day for the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) or Iceriver KS2?
The Iceriver KS2 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) vs Iceriver KS2: which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver KS2 scores 45/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) and Iceriver KS2?
The Bitmain Antminer KS3 (9.4Th) runs at 372.3 J/TH while the Iceriver KS2 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 227.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 38% better efficiency (372 vs 600 J/TH).