Skip to content

We're upgrading our operations to serve you better. Orders ship as usual from Laval, QC. Questions? Contact us

Bitcoin accepted at checkout  |  Ships from Laval, QC, Canada  |  Expert support since 2016

Antminer KS5 Pro

Antminer KS5 Pro

Hashrate 21.0 TH/s Power 3,150 W Efficiency 150.0 J/TH
VS
Goldshell KA BOX

Goldshell KA BOX

Hashrate 1.2 TH/s Power 400 W Efficiency 339.0 J/TH

Antminer KS5 Pro vs Goldshell KA BOX

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Antminer KS5 Pro Specification Goldshell KA BOX
21.0 TH/s Hashrate 1.2 TH/s
3,150 W Power Consumption 400 W
150.0 J/TH Efficiency 339.0 J/TH
75 dB Noise Level 55 dB
14.5 kg Weight 2.6 kg
10,748 BTU/hr BTU Output 1,365 BTU/hr
36/100 Home Mining Score 62/100
Release Year
KHeavyHash Algorithm KHeavyHash
Bitmain Manufacturer Goldshell

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Antminer KS5 Pro

Daily Revenue 0.00000966 BTC $0.76
Daily Electricity -$7.56
Daily Profit -$6.80
Monthly -$204.12
Yearly -$2,483.44

Goldshell KA BOX

Daily Revenue 0.00000054 BTC $0.04
Daily Electricity -$0.96
Daily Profit -$0.92
Monthly -$27.53
Yearly -$334.89

Based on BTC price of $78,234 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Both the Antminer KS5 Pro and Goldshell KA BOX are closely matched across our scoring factors, with neither holding a decisive advantage. Your choice should depend on your specific priorities — review the specs and profitability analysis above.

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Antminer KS5 Pro and Goldshell KA BOX actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Antminer KS5 Pro 1680% more hashrate (21.0 vs 1.2 TH/s)
  • Goldshell KA BOX 87% better power draw (3,150 vs 400 W)
  • Antminer KS5 Pro 56% better efficiency (150 vs 339 J/TH)
  • Goldshell KA BOX 27% better noise (75.0 vs 55.0 dB)
  • Goldshell KA BOX 82% better weight (14.5 vs 2.6 kg)
  • Antminer KS5 Pro 688% more heat output (10,748 vs 1,365 BTU/hr)
  • Goldshell KA BOX 72% more home mining score (36.0 vs 62.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.

Antminer KS5 Pro Metric Goldshell KA BOX
$15,000 Upfront cost (MSRP) $305
-$6.80 Daily net profit -$0.92
-$17,483 Net after 1 year -$640
-$19,967 Net after 2 years -$975
-$22,450 Net after 3 years -$1,310
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Goldshell KA BOX

Score: 62/100. 55 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Antminer KS5 Pro

150.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Antminer KS5 Pro vs Goldshell KA BOX: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KA BOX is more profitable at $-0.92/day compared to $-6.80/day for the Antminer KS5 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Antminer KS5 Pro or Goldshell KA BOX?

The Goldshell KA BOX is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Antminer KS5 Pro at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the Antminer KS5 Pro or Goldshell KA BOX?

The Goldshell KA BOX scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Antminer KS5 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Antminer KS5 Pro and Goldshell KA BOX on J/TH?

The Antminer KS5 Pro runs at 150.0 J/TH while the Goldshell KA BOX runs at 339.0 J/TH — a difference of 189.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 56% better efficiency (150 vs 339 J/TH).