Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) vs Antminer L7
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) | Specification | Antminer L7 |
|---|---|---|
| 33.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 9,050.0 MH/s |
| 5,676 W | Power Consumption | 3,425 W |
| 172,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 378,453.0 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| — | Weight | 14.4 kg |
| 19,367 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,686 BTU/hr |
| 44/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithm | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh)
Antminer L7
Based on BTC price of $78,239 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 265% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Antminer L7 holds the edge in power consumption and price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) and Antminer L7 sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) 265% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Antminer L7 40% better power draw (5,676 vs 3,425 W)
- Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) 55% better efficiency (172,000 vs 378,453 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) 33% better noise (50.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) 66% more heat output (19,367 vs 11,686 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) 22% more home mining score (44.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) | Metric | Antminer L7 |
|---|---|---|
| $16,888 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $4,500 |
| -$13.62 | Daily net profit | -$8.22 |
| -$21,860 | Net after 1 year | -$7,500 |
| -$26,831 | Net after 2 years | -$10,500 |
| -$31,803 | Net after 3 years | -$13,501 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh)Score: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh)172,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) or the Antminer L7?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer L7 is more profitable at $-8.22/day compared to $-13.62/day for the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) vs Antminer L7: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Antminer L7 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) or Antminer L7?
The Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Antminer L7). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) and Antminer L7?
The Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) runs at 172,000.0 J/TH while the Antminer L7 runs at 378,453.0 J/TH — a difference of 206,453.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 55% better efficiency (172,000 vs 378,453 J/TH).