Antminer D7 vs Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Antminer D7 | Specification | Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| 1,286.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 33.0 GH/s |
| 3,148 W | Power Consumption | 5,676 W |
| 2,447.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 172,000.0 J/TH |
| 70 dB | Noise Level | 50 dB |
| 14.4 kg | Weight | — |
| 10,741 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 19,367 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 44/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithm | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Antminer D7
Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh)
Based on BTC price of $78,158 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Antminer D7 edges it: 4 of 6 factors go its way (efficiency, hashrate, power consumption, price-performance). Where it pulls away hardest is 99% better efficiency (2,448 vs 172,000 J/TH). That said, the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins home mining score and noise level. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Antminer D7 and Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Antminer D7 3797% more hashrate (1.3 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Antminer D7 45% better power draw (3,148 vs 5,676 W)
- Antminer D7 99% better efficiency (2,448 vs 172,000 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) 29% better noise (70.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) 80% more heat output (10,741 vs 19,367 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) 22% more home mining score (36.0 vs 44.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Antminer D7 | Metric | Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) |
|---|---|---|
| $2,500 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $16,888 |
| -$7.51 | Daily net profit | -$13.62 |
| -$5,241 | Net after 1 year | -$21,860 |
| -$7,982 | Net after 2 years | -$26,831 |
| -$10,722 | Net after 3 years | -$31,803 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh)Score: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Antminer D72,447.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Antminer D7 vs Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Antminer D7 is more profitable at $-7.51/day compared to $-13.62/day for the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Antminer D7 or the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Antminer D7 at 70 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Antminer D7 or Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh)?
The Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Antminer D7). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Antminer D7 vs Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh): how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Antminer D7 runs at 2,447.9 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) runs at 172,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 169,552.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficiency (2,448 vs 172,000 J/TH).