Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) vs Elphapex DG 2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) | Specification | Elphapex DG 2 |
|---|---|---|
| 33.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 20.0 GH/s |
| 5,676 W | Power Consumption | 3,800 W |
| 172,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 190,000.0 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Noise Level | 75 dB |
| — | Weight | 18.3 kg |
| 19,367 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,966 BTU/hr |
| 44/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithm | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Elphapex |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh)
Elphapex DG 2
Based on BTC price of $78,158 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficiency, hashrate, home mining score, noise level). Its biggest concrete edge: 65% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Elphapex DG 2 holds the edge in power consumption and price-performance. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) and Elphapex DG 2 sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) 65% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Elphapex DG 2 33% better power draw (5,676 vs 3,800 W)
- Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) 9% better efficiency (172,000 vs 190,000 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) 33% better noise (50.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) 49% more heat output (19,367 vs 12,966 BTU/hr)
- Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) 47% more home mining score (44.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) | Metric | Elphapex DG 2 |
|---|---|---|
| $16,888 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $4,680 |
| -$13.62 | Daily net profit | -$9.12 |
| -$21,860 | Net after 1 year | -$8,009 |
| -$26,831 | Net after 2 years | -$11,337 |
| -$31,803 | Net after 3 years | -$14,666 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh)Score: 44/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh)172,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) or the Elphapex DG 2?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Elphapex DG 2 is more profitable at $-9.12/day compared to $-13.62/day for the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) or the Elphapex DG 2 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Elphapex DG 2 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) or the Elphapex DG 2?
The Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) scores 44/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Elphapex DG 2). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) and Elphapex DG 2?
The Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) runs at 172,000.0 J/TH while the Elphapex DG 2 runs at 190,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 18,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 9% better efficiency (172,000 vs 190,000 J/TH).