Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) vs Goldshell E-DG1M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) | Specification | Goldshell E-DG1M |
|---|---|---|
| 33.0 GH/s | Hashrate | 3.4 GH/s |
| 5,676 W | Power Consumption | 1,800 W |
| 172,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 529,411.8 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Noise Level | 45 dB |
| — | Weight | 16.0 kg |
| 19,367 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,142 BTU/hr |
| 44/100 | Home Mining Score | 56/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Scrypt | Algorithm | Scrypt |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh)
Goldshell E-DG1M
Based on BTC price of $78,165 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
The Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) and Goldshell E-DG1M finish in a near dead heat in our weighted scoring. There is no wrong answer here — let your electricity rate, noise tolerance and budget break the tie using the breakdowns above.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) and Goldshell E-DG1M sit on each measurable spec:
- Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) 871% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell E-DG1M 68% better power draw (5,676 vs 1,800 W)
- Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) 68% better efficiency (172,000 vs 529,412 J/TH)
- Goldshell E-DG1M 10% better noise (50.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) 215% more heat output (19,367 vs 6,142 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell E-DG1M 27% more home mining score (44.0 vs 56.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) | Metric | Goldshell E-DG1M |
|---|---|---|
| $16,888 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $799 |
| -$13.62 | Daily net profit | -$4.32 |
| -$21,860 | Net after 1 year | -$2,376 |
| -$26,831 | Net after 2 years | -$3,953 |
| -$31,803 | Net after 3 years | -$5,529 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell E-DG1MScore: 56/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh)172,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) or the Goldshell E-DG1M?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell E-DG1M is more profitable at $-4.32/day compared to $-13.62/day for the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) or the Goldshell E-DG1M better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell E-DG1M is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) at 50 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) vs Goldshell E-DG1M: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell E-DG1M scores 56/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 44/100 for the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) and Goldshell E-DG1M on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer L11.HU6 (33Gh) runs at 172,000.0 J/TH while the Goldshell E-DG1M runs at 529,411.8 J/TH — a difference of 357,411.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 68% better efficiency (172,000 vs 529,412 J/TH).